Unknown's avatar

dedicate being

(A Tibetan Rinpoche) gently advised, “Dedicate. Before you write and after you write, make sure to give it away.” …For writing practice to be complete, we must give it away: the effort, the results, and identification with the results.  Much of the happiness that total absorption in an activity brings is nullified by the belief that it is ours – that we know what we are doing.  But anything we hold onto causes disharmony.

Dedicating your writing and your efforts to write resituates your primary intention within a larger context.  You become a vessel through which creative spirit flows.  Without this resituation (letting-go), one leaves tracks.

Gail Sher, One Continuous Mistake

It is true of all things, big and little.  Give it away and watch it soar.

Each year I pick up what was given away by a Nobel Prize Winner in Literature.  This year is Doris Lessing’s Martha Quest, the story about a young girl’s life on a farm in Africa.  I give myself the whole year to read it, word by delicious word, savouring the gift as if it is a deep, dark, delicious sweet.  This is the opening paragraph.  A gift to you.

Two elderly women sat knitting on the part of the veranda which was screened from the sun by a golden shower creeper; the tough stems were so thick with flower it was as if the glaring afternoon was dammed against them in a surf of its own light made visible in the dripping, orange-coloured clusters.  Inside this coloured barrier was a darkened recess, rough mud walls (the outer walls of the house itself) forming two sides, the third consisting of a bench loaded with painted petrol tins which held pink and white geraniums.  The sun splashed liberal gold through the foliage, over the red cement floor, and over the ladies.  They had been here since lunchtime, and would remain until sunset, talking, talking incessantly, their tongues mercifully let off the leash.  They were Mrs Quest and Mrs Van Rensberg; and Martha Quest, a girl of fifteen, sat on the steps in full sunshine, clumsily twisting herself to keep the glare from her book with her own shadow.

Unknown's avatar

poison naming

The (inner) voice … poised to prey upon your insecurity and guilt…does not require answering.  Naming is enough.  The moment you hear this voice, you must identify precisely who it is – a voice that is dedicated to undermining your newly-achieved (and bravely fought for) commitment to write.

Gail Sher (pg 89), One Continuous Mistake

The external obstacles of practice may be numberless but the internal voices of the critic, the trickster, the false friend, the colluder, the enabler, the fearful are legion.  Some derive their power from their historical presence, some from an insidious compassion, and some from a voracious feeding off our fear, desire, and confusion.  We aren’t used to naming these because for the most part they are deep physiological sensations and also because the experience is a lightning flash with little time to fit words to it.

Sher uses the fairy tale of Little Red Riding Hood to illustrate her point of naming the disingenuous presence.  The wolf would not have got too far if Red Riding Hood had named it for who it was.  She doesn’t develop the metaphor much but it opened an area of inquiry for me in terms of my tendency to want things to be what I think they should be.  That particular delusional tendency slices both ways: I’d prefer wolfie was granny and I fear that granny is actually wolfie.  Sometimes I’m right – when my practice of discernment is strongly informed by my intuition that something is not quite right about the picture.  Sometimes I’m wrong because I can only see part of the picture and I’m fixated on protecting myself.

I like this quote from Parabola (Facebook):

“There is a part of everything which is unexplored, because we are accustomed to using our eyes only in association with the memory of what people before us have thought of the thing we are looking at. Even the smallest thing has something in it which is unknown.”- Gustave Flaubert

This is a challenge – to name the poison and the panacea outside of memory.  In practice, it shows up in those moments when I can speak to what is holding me back or propelling me forward.  Yet in order to see the unknown in something as familiar yet ineffable as the un-named, I need a new lens.  In a different context, Sher uses the mantra “without memory, without desire, without understanding.”  This helps.

To approach practice without memory is to be released from the old stories of failure or success.  To be without desire is to let go of the need to influence the process.  Sher suggests that to go without understanding means there is the possibility of something new to arise.

For me, however, to go without understanding is to watch the arrogance and greed unable to take hold while service and gratitude arise.

Thank you for practising,

Genju